活泉甘霖的帳戶下來了! 詳情請點擊這裡

Q&A - 從變貌看信仰的原貌

2 contributions / 0 nouveau(x)
Dernière contribution
Q&A - 從變貌看信仰的原貌
敬愛的和不流聽閱者,
 
各位好!
 
本次「從變貌看信仰的原貌」研討會的錄音已經在本站發表,
如果您對本次主題範圍有不清楚或任何疑問,歡迎各位提出您的問題,
10天後相關人員將與大家分享所領受的,盡力回答您的提問
 
提問方法 :
1. 若是您尚未登記為和不流使用者,請先加入。
2. 可以使用本名或筆名提問。對使用筆名者,和不流管理委員會基於必要原則會要求提示本名,並為之保密。
3. 登入和不流後,請到「討論區」的「研討會後的問與答提出您的疑問
    請直接在此主題下發表回應,寫出您的問題;或者可以把您的問題錄音下來後,上傳到回應的附加檔案。
4. 本活動時間為 15天,可視情況調節活動時間長短
5. 若有來不及參與本次研討會後之線上 Q&A 活動之聽閱者,
    可以向管理員聯繫,我們將另闢時段優先為您安排。
6. 和不流「討論區」是一個公開討論議題的平台,
    敬請參與本活動時遵守民主風度,
    如有挑撥、謾罵、公然侮辱、毀謗、抹黑之情事, 
    和不流管理委員會直接刪除該發表。
 
和不流管理委員會  
台灣活泉甘霖教育文化協會  敬

 

A few questions

I have a few questions after listening to the seminar:

1. It was mentioned that some TJCs in China do not practice footwashing sacrament right after baptism. Do we know why they don't practice footwashing because even the meeting resolution in 1932 did not abolish the need for footwashing after baptism? Also, Could someone please name some of these TJCs and provide some contact details if possible? I would like to carry out some research myself.

2. The example of Philip preaching in Samaria (Acts 8) was mentioned by YM.   

    a) Why do you think the believers in Samaria were unable to receive the Holy Spirit through Philip?

    b) I don't quite understand how such example could be used to argue against the understanding that only those who have received the Holy Spirit could be filled by the Holy Spirit. Could YM please clarify?

3. If I did not misunderstand YM, the reason why he thinks as believers we also need to undergo transifiguration like Jesus Christ was that God said the same thing twice in Luke 3:22 and 9:35. However, if one reads carefully and compare the words of God in those two verses (also considering the context), it can be reasoned that actually the words of God in Luke 3:22 were meant to be heard by Jesus Christ only and the words of God in Luke 9:35 were spoken to the three disciples! In other words, during Jesus’ baptism the words of God were meant to confirm to Jesus and Jesus only that ‘you are my beloved son, whom I am pleased with’, while the words of God during Jesus’ transfiguration were meant to confirm to the disciples and disciples only that ‘this (Jesus) is my beloved son, so you must obey Him’. Can YM agree with such understanding? If so, can he give another good reason why transfiguration is also applicable to us today?

I actually have some more questions to ask but need time to organise my thoughts. That's it for now and thanks for taking the time to answer my queries.